Skip to main content

COMMON MISCONCEPTIONS ON CLIMATE CHANGE

Welcome curious minds to my second blog! Since this will be my first official post, I will not make it complicated or heavy. As a researcher who studied many different aspects of climate change, I thought I will give a brief introduction on climate change and the many misconceptions that roots from public perception. 

Climate change is a subject that can no longer be ignored but it is, however, constantly challenged by leaders, experts from other fields and also the general public on a global scale. Firstly, we have to understand that changing the climate is a natural phenomenon which occurs over a long period of time but the changes we can observe today are not part of a natural phenomenon. The climatic changes which cause erratic seasonal changes, extreme rainfall, droughts, and prolonged heat waves are all occurring more frequently than ever recorded in history. These changes started a few decades ago, but it is clear that after the industrial revolution and all the ill practices that were born from it pushed the atmospheric gas composition towards an abnormal level giving rise to anthropogenic climate change.

We all learnt about the gases that make up the atmosphere, that these gases are vital for the greenhouse effect which enables life on this planet. So what happens if the gases that capture radiation to produce heat keeps increasing? The higher the gas composition, the stronger the warming, which led to the famous term “Global Warming”. It was very easy for many to tear this term apart as it spoke of a world which is supposed to be warming in front of our eyes. People perceived that global warming meant that every part of the world had to experience higher temperatures and unbearable heat, but when that was not observed and experienced as was imagined, it was very easy to dismiss the evidence and the research that was published by climate scientists. This led to a new term “Climate Change”, a term that cannot cause confusion about the warming of the climate but rather encompass a definition which states that it is more than just a change in temperature. It is the long term change in the very climate which decides the seasons, rainfall, snowfall and extreme weather events. For instance, if one region experiences heat waves, another region could experience high snowfall which suggests an increase in extreme weather events.

Image courtesy: Financial Tribune (2017) - Coral bleaching of the Great Barrier Reef 

Why is temperature important to us? Temperature is the key factor which determines most processes in our ecosystems. It decides the species composition, specifically for reptiles where temperature decides the sex of the young and eventually the survival of the species. There is a clear observable, tangible evidence that confirms the decreasing of the Arctic sea ice cover, which will have major effects on wildlife and indirect impacts for us. Increasing temperature has detrimental effects on marine life, reducing their tolerance to other stresses and also altering change in species diversity. There is a strong correlation between increasing greenhouse gases and increasing temperature. For example, in marine ecosystems temperature and ocean acidity occurring at the same time can be two extreme stresses which can have harmful effects on marine life. To elaborate, increasing COconcentrations cause a significant increment in ocean acidification and this coupled with high temperatures lead to mass bleaching events of coral reefs and all other marine species that require calcium carbonate structures to survive. 

Even with evidence spanning across the natural systems, it is still easy for people to disconnect from environmental issues such as climate change, simply because the climate is not understood. There is a common misconception regarding the accuracy of future climate projections, that if it is difficult to predict the weather for the next few days how are we are basing policy on climate projections. The simple answer to this would be that weather data is more unpredictable because it predicts the near future but climate projections predict weather patterns over a long period of time, the calculations provide scenarios based on models which take into account other variables to provide an accurate projection of climate. The physical science basis report from IPCC in 2007 stated that “when the weather is averaged over space and time, the fact that the globe is warming emerges clearly from the data”. Another common misunderstanding roots from experts who claimed that the changes in climate we experience today is not anthropogenic but rather a part of the natural climate system. They state that dramatic changes in climate have occurred in the last 1000 years and the natural climate system can regulate these changes on its own. However, there is evidence now to prove that the greenhouse gas effects now outweigh the natural variability that is observed in the climate system. Best described by Cowley, et al (2000) “A 21st-century global warming projection far exceeds the natural variability of the past 1000 years and is greater than the best estimate of global temperature change for the last interglacial”. 


I will conclude by noting that denialism has governed the issues on climate change for decades which has led this planet to the brink of irreversible ecological damage. Its impacts can be observed on a global scale, it is, however, more evident than it has ever been especially for island nations such as Sri Lanka. Therefore, let's be more aware of our actions, each of us has a role to play in ensuring the survival of Earth. More on the impacts of climate change will be posted in my upcoming blogs, so keep a lookout. Hope you enjoyed the read and learned something new. 


Comments

Unknown said…
The so called "technology advancements" and "industrial revolutions" started in the latter parts of last century would certainly outweigh the greenhouse gas emissions over the last 1000 years. The data you have presented and the message you are communicating is loud and clear. With many thousands of the likes of you, the world is still moving the was it has in the last few decades. While I admire the little steps you and others are trying to make, I strongly feel we need to make this a bigger movement. How, when, and what, is something I am still thinking. However, I do agree, that every small step, counts; and make a difference to reduce climate change, and to make a better world for our tomorrow.
GaiaAge said…
Thank you for your encouraging words. I do agree a bigger global movement is needed and every small step counts, however, governments have a strong role to play in this as well.

Popular posts from this blog

FOREST COVER IN SRI LANKA

Welcome curious minds to my weekly blog! Yesterday was quite an exciting day for me, I attended a tree planting event organised by Janathakshan (GTE) Ltd (my workplace) in collaboration with MAS Holdings which was held in Siwalakuluma, Anuradhapura. The tree planting program was organised as a part of the CRIWM Project (Climate Resilient Integrated Water Management Project), this is a seven-year project funded by the Green Climate Fund (GCF) through the UNDP in Sri Lanka. Janathakshan is an implementing partner organisation for this project in Anuradhapura. The project aims to develop a cascade ecosystem around tanks that are been rehabilitated under this project. To initiate a cascade ecosystem, land around tanks will be planted with trees such as Kumbuk (Terminalia arjuna), Mee (Nauclea orientalis), Karanda (Pongamia pinnata) and Maila (Bauhinia racemosa). The tree planting program on Saturday 26th of January succeeded in planting around 1500 trees around the tanks of Sembigewewa an

HUMAN WILDLIFE CONFLICT IN SRI LANKA

Welcome curious minds to an intriguing blog! Humans and wildlife have coexisted since the dawn of civilisation, historically most encounters between humans and wildlife were life-threatening to each party. A simple term called Human-Wildlife Conflict coined by the IUCN World Parks Congress (Madden 2004) is defined as “when the needs and behaviour of wildlife impact negatively on the goals of humans or when the goals of humans negatively impact the needs of wildlife. These conflicts may result when wildlife damage crops, injure or kill domestic animals, threaten or kill people”. I will try my best to unravel the modern human-wildlife conflict in Sri Lanka.  Firstly, it is important to understand the historical aspect of livelihoods in Sri Lanka and the coexistence that prevailed during these periods and how it was lost to current society. During the many interesting and informative conversations I have had with farming communities in different regions, the older generation of farm