Skip to main content

VECTOR-BORNE DISEASES AND CLIMATE CHANGE

Welcome curious readers! Today I would like to talk about the relationship between climate change and vector-borne diseases. Yes! There is a positive correlation. Currently, Africa and Asia are known for facing some of the deadliest diseases on the planet, but they are spreading worldwide. Majority of these diseases are vector-borne. 

The importance of addressing vector-borne diseases is because malaria and dengue are responsible for high rates of mortality especially in Africa and Asia. Vector-borne diseases have also had a strong influence on the survival rates of children and adults in the past and at present Around 12% of mortality in tropical regions can be directly attributed to vector-borne diseases. The mosquito species that are responsible for dengue and malaria are climate sensitive, which means they have a specific temperature window for optimum establishment (Githeko, et al., 2000). Future climate projections from the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) reports predicting a global increase of atmospheric temperature of 0.2°C within the next two decades (IPCC, 2007). The increase in temperature would also increase precipitation and extreme weather events; this will promote the prevalence of vector-borne diseases. 

Change in the global climate has the potential to distribute the vectors to other regions of the world, where they have been previously eradicated from or places that have no previous record of the diseases (Patz, et al., 2005). In 2004, The World Health Organisation (WHO) reported that climate change was responsible for 3% of malaria deaths and 3.8% of dengue fever deaths worldwide (Gamage, et al., 2016). There are other factors apart from climate change that affect the distribution of these diseases and they include socio-economic situations and the spatial relationship with the vector breeding sites. Therefore it is important to understand and address the relationship between vector-borne diseases and the future scenarios of climate change.

The mosquito responsible for malaria is known as the Anopheles mosquito (Caminade, et al., 2016). There is a specific climate window for the successful survival of the mosquito; the temperature should be more than 18°C and less than 37°C, alternatively, there can be exceptions to this temperature window as sometimes the vectors develop resistance (Caminade, et al., 2016). In terms of favourable climate for the mosquito, high precipitation is a key condition as it provides breeding sites for the mosquito; while the temperature is responsible for the aggressiveness and mortality of the mosquito (Caminade, et al., 2016). Malaria was responsible for 438,000 deaths worldwide in 2015 according to the World Health Organisation (WHO, 2015). 

Dengue fever is still a major vector-borne disease in Asia but is also a global issue as around 100 countries report the spread of the disease. According to a recent estimate, there are around 390 million records of dengue infections annually (Benelli, Mehlhorn, 2016). Moreover, the actual numbers of dengue infection cases have been underreported and misclassified according to the World Health Organisation. There are two types of dengue fever; one is the 'dengue-fever' which has characteristics such as the influenza disease and the other being the fatal version known as the 'dengue haemorrhage' (Guha-Sapir, Schimmer, 2005). The two mosquito species accountable for transmitting dengue infection are the Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. 

There is strong evidence that dengue infection is spreading across the Americas during the last decade, even though dengue is generally associated with tropical regions (Butterworth, et al., 2017). The estimated dengue transmission was highest during the summer months but certain places such as Texas showed transmission in the fall and spring seasons as well. It is endemic to the southeastern United States but climate change can potentially lead to an epidemic which would support the transmission of dengue to other states that do not currently support it. 

In conclusion, Dengue and malaria are two of the most life-threatening vector-borne diseases in the world where 12% of mortality is associated with the tropics; if strategies aren't in place to control these diseases and eradicate them soon, the probability of these diseases to be a global health challenge is definitive. According to the life cycle of the vector, in this case, the mosquito; increase rainfall, temperature, relative humidity, and extreme weather events can increase the survival rate of the vector. Survival of the vector depends on the geographical locations as well. There are a variety of factors that should be considered when addressing vector-borne disease prevalence such as forest clearing for agricultural purposes; if dengue and malaria were to be controlled on a global scale to have minimum impact on human survival all the factors that contribute to the prevalence should be managed. 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

HUMAN WILDLIFE CONFLICT IN SRI LANKA

Welcome curious minds to an intriguing blog! Humans and wildlife have coexisted since the dawn of civilisation, historically most encounters between humans and wildlife were life-threatening to each party. A simple term called Human-Wildlife Conflict coined by the IUCN World Parks Congress (Madden 2004) is defined as “when the needs and behaviour of wildlife impact negatively on the goals of humans or when the goals of humans negatively impact the needs of wildlife. These conflicts may result when wildlife damage crops, injure or kill domestic animals, threaten or kill people”. I will try my best to unravel the modern human-wildlife conflict in Sri Lanka.  Firstly, it is important to understand the historical aspect of livelihoods in Sri Lanka and the coexistence that prevailed during these periods and how it was lost to current society. During the many interesting and informative conversations I have had with farming communities in different regions, the older generation of farm

PLANT BASED DIET OVER MEAT BASED DIET

Welcome curious visitors! Today I would like to discuss a topic that has grabbed my attention and sparked a personal psychological/attitudinal change in my life. It is evident from research studies conducted globally that we are reaching our planetary boundaries. The question is, is there a way we can minimise consumption and ensure sustainable resource management? I will tell you why having a plant-based diet can be beneficial for the planet and yourself.  Image courtesy: FAO, 2019. I have had this conversation with a number of people and it was clear that there is a huge knowledge gap in society regarding basic farming activities and the effects it has on the planet. It should really be a core subject taught to kids from a young age, even though it rarely happens. So why am I fixated on farming? I have decided to be a vegetarian due to two basic realisations. One and the most relevant to today’s blog is the carbon footprint a meat-based meal contains over a plant-based me